Sonar Pro Search is Perplexity’s Pro Search mode for Sonar Pro, designed to answer questions that require several information-gathering steps. It can run repeated web searches, retrieve page content and combine what it finds into a researched response. The mode is distinct from the quicker search path and from the separately named Sonar Deep Research model.
The producer describes automated orchestration of web search and page retrieval. Instead of leaving the user to turn each search result into the next query, the search process can pursue the intermediate questions needed for the answer. Its documented configuration offers pro, fast and automatic search choices; the automatic choice classifies the query by complexity. These are producer search settings rather than names for three different fixed checkpoints.
Perplexity’s published Pro Search workflow requires streaming and exposes the reasoning process while the search develops. A client receiving that producer stream needs to keep the sequence of progress and answer content in order. The finished research answer is the useful artifact; a progress update alone is not the completed explanation or comparison requested by the user.
Prepare the question with the entity, location, period and decision criteria that matter. For example, a technology comparison can ask which documented capabilities satisfy a specified integration requirement, which conditions differ between the candidates and what evidence supports the distinction. An effective result has the comparison, the supporting source material and the unresolved questions that still affect the choice.
For a question with several dependencies, state the final objective and the constraints together. A project investigation might need to identify the relevant product documentation, compare two implementation approaches and explain which published limitations apply. Ask for the findings to be organized by the requirement they answer, so that a reader can trace the conclusion back to the evidence used for it.
Review the returned research as an evidence-based answer: distinguish a source’s explicit statement from the model’s inference, and keep conflicting or incomplete information visible. The model’s role here is search and synthesis. Changes to an external system or execution of a proposed implementation remain actions for the surrounding application.
", "aboutText": "Sonar Pro Search is Perplexity’s Pro Search mode for Sonar Pro, designed to answer questions that require several information-gathering steps. It can run repeated web searches, retrieve page content and combine what it finds into a researched response. The mode is distinct from the quicker search path and from the separately named Sonar Deep Research model.\n\nThe producer describes automated orchestration of web search and page retrieval. Instead of leaving the user to turn each search result into the next query, the search process can pursue the intermediate questions needed for the answer. Its documented configuration offers pro, fast and automatic search choices; the automatic choice classifies the query by complexity. These are producer search settings rather than names for three different fixed checkpoints.\n\nPerplexity’s published Pro Search workflow requires streaming and exposes the reasoning process while the search develops. A client receiving that producer stream needs to keep the sequence of progress and answer content in order. The finished research answer is the useful artifact; a progress update alone is not the completed explanation or comparison requested by the user.\n\nPrepare the question with the entity, location, period and decision criteria that matter. For example, a technology comparison can ask which documented capabilities satisfy a specified integration requirement, which conditions differ between the candidates and what evidence supports the distinction. An effective result has the comparison, the supporting source material and the unresolved questions that still affect the choice.\n\nFor a question with several dependencies, state the final objective and the constraints together. A project investigation might need to identify the relevant product documentation, compare two implementation approaches and explain which published limitations apply. Ask for the findings to be organized by the requirement they answer, so that a reader can trace the conclusion back to the evidence used for it.\n\nReview the returned research as an evidence-based answer: distinguish a source’s explicit statement from the model’s inference, and keep conflicting or incomplete information visible. The model’s role here is search and synthesis. Changes to an external system or execution of a proposed implementation remain actions for the surrounding application.", "editorialOverlay": { "copy_fields": { "practical_html": "Technical example in English
Synthesize a multi-source integration comparison\n\nUse these supplied documentation excerpts to compare storage choices. DOC-A: Product A supports daily snapshots and restore of an entire project. DOC-B: Product B supports hourly snapshots and restore of individual records. Our requirement is hourly recovery of one accidentally deleted record. Identify the relevant capabilities, recommend the better-documented fit and list unresolved retention and access questions.A requirement-led comparison citing DOC-A and DOC-B, a recommendation and explicit gaps in the supplied evidence.The answer links both snapshot frequency and restore granularity to the requirement and does not invent retention limits.perplexity/sonar-pro-searchPerplexity’s Sonar Pro Search is the multi-step search mode of Sonar Pro. It combines repeated web searches and page retrieval with reasoning to build a researched answer, with streamed progress in the producer’s documented workflow.
This description covers the model’s capabilities. Available in Ailoot inputs, outputs and options are listed for the selected method below.
Sonar Pro Search is Perplexity’s Pro Search mode for Sonar Pro, designed to answer questions that require several information-gathering steps. It can run repeated web searches, retrieve page content and combine what it finds into a researched response. The mode is distinct from the quicker search path and from the separately named Sonar Deep Research model.
The producer describes automated orchestration of web search and page retrieval. Instead of leaving the user to turn each search result into the next query, the search process can pursue the intermediate questions needed for the answer. Its documented configuration offers pro, fast and automatic search choices; the automatic choice classifies the query by complexity. These are producer search settings rather than names for three different fixed checkpoints.
Perplexity’s published Pro Search workflow requires streaming and exposes the reasoning process while the search develops. A client receiving that producer stream needs to keep the sequence of progress and answer content in order. The finished research answer is the useful artifact; a progress update alone is not the completed explanation or comparison requested by the user.
Prepare the question with the entity, location, period and decision criteria that matter. For example, a technology comparison can ask which documented capabilities satisfy a specified integration requirement, which conditions differ between the candidates and what evidence supports the distinction. An effective result has the comparison, the supporting source material and the unresolved questions that still affect the choice.
For a question with several dependencies, state the final objective and the constraints together. A project investigation might need to identify the relevant product documentation, compare two implementation approaches and explain which published limitations apply. Ask for the findings to be organized by the requirement they answer, so that a reader can trace the conclusion back to the evidence used for it.
Review the returned research as an evidence-based answer: distinguish a source’s explicit statement from the model’s inference, and keep conflicting or incomplete information visible. The model’s role here is search and synthesis. Changes to an external system or execution of a proposed implementation remain actions for the surrounding application.
POST /v1/chat/completionstexttext| Field | Type | Requirement | Values & limits | Default |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Fieldmodel | Typestring | RequirementRequired | Values & limits perplexity/sonar-pro-search | Default— |
Fieldmessages | Typemessage[] | RequirementRequired | Values & limits Minimum items: 1 | Default— |
Fieldmessages[].role | Typestring | RequirementRequired | Values & limits Examples: system, user, assistant, tool, function Conditions: These roles are explicitly represented by Source compatibility types; the exact model role set remains model-specific. Model-specific | Default— |
Fieldmessages[].content | Typestring|content_part[]|null | RequirementOptional | Values & limits | Default— |
Fieldmessages[].tool_calls | Typetool_call[] | RequirementOptional | Values & limits | Default— |
Fieldmessages[].tool_call_id | Typestring | RequirementOptional | Values & limits Applies when: role=tool; use actual returned ID | Default— |
Fieldmessages[].name | Typestring | RequirementOptional | Values & limits | Default— |
Fieldmessages[].reasoning_content | Typestring | RequirementOptional | Values & limits Applies when: Round-trip actual returned reasoning where this model uses it | Default— |
Fieldmessages[].reasoning_details | Typeobject|array | RequirementOptional | Values & limits Model-specific | Default— |
Fieldmax_tokens | Typeinteger | RequirementOptional | Values & limits Minimum: 1 Model-specific | Default— |
Fieldmax_completion_tokens | Typeinteger | RequirementOptional | Values & limits Minimum: 1 Model-specific | Default— |
Fieldstream | Typeboolean | RequirementOptional | Values & limits | Defaultfalse |
Fieldstream_options.include_usage | Typeboolean | RequirementOptional | Values & limits Model-specific | Default— |
Fieldtemperature | Typenumber | RequirementOptional | Values & limits Model-specific | Default— |
Fieldtop_p | Typenumber | RequirementOptional | Values & limits Model-specific | Default— |
Fieldstop | Typestring|string[] | RequirementOptional | Values & limits Model-specific | Default— |
Fieldtools | Typefunction_tool[] | RequirementOptional | Values & limits Model-specific | Default— |
Fieldtools[].type | Typestring | RequirementOptional | Values & limits function Model-specific | Default— |
Fieldtools[].function.name | Typestring | RequirementRequired | Values & limits Applies when: function tool supplied | Default— |
Fieldtools[].function.description | Typestring | RequirementOptional | Values & limits | Default— |
Fieldtools[].function.parameters | TypeJSON_schema | RequirementOptional | Values & limits | Default— |
Fieldtool_choice | Typestring|object | RequirementOptional | Values & limits Model-specific | Default— |
Fieldparallel_tool_calls | Typeboolean | RequirementOptional | Values & limits Model-specific | Default— |
Fieldresponse_format | Typeobject | RequirementOptional | Values & limits Model-specific | Default— |
Fieldreasoning_effort | Typestring | RequirementOptional | Values & limits Model-specific | Default— |
Fieldreasoning | Typeobject | RequirementOptional | Values & limits Model-specific | Default— |
Fieldservice_tier | Typestring | RequirementOptional | Values & limits Model-specific | Default— |
Fieldinstructions | Typestring | RequirementOptional | Values & limits Compatibility field | Default— |
Fieldfunctions | Typefunction[] | RequirementOptional | Values & limits Model-specific | Default— |
Fieldfunction_call | Typestring|object | RequirementOptional | Values & limits Model-specific | Default— |
Fieldprompt_cache_options | Typeobject | RequirementOptional | Values & limits Model-specific | Default— |
Fieldmodalities | Typestring[] | RequirementOptional | Values & limits text | Default— |
Fieldprovider | Typeobject | RequirementOptional | Values & limits Conditions: provider.options is rejected on this Ultra text route | Default— |
Fieldcache_control.ttl | Typestring | RequirementOptional | Values & limits Conditions: 1h is rejected in actual prompt-cache locations | Default— |
Text · UTF8 text
messages[].content
| Parameter | Contract |
|---|---|
Parametercontent_type | Contractapplication/json |
Parameterrequired | Contractmodel, messages |
Parametermaterial_types | Contracttext |
Parametermessages | Contractmessage array with role/content shape |
Parameterfile_material | Contractactual UTF-8 document inserted as literal text; no file ID inferred |
Parameteroptional_controls | Contractstream, temperature, top_p, stop, max_tokens, max_completion_tokens, reasoning, response_format, tools, tool_choice |
Parametercontrol_scope | Contractmodel-specific; user function tools differ from hosted tools |
Parameteroutput_modalities | Contracttext |
Parameterhosted_operations | Contractfalse |
Parametermultimodal_input_binding | Contractnull |
Lifecycle: synchronous_or_streamed
Send exact model ID with messages.
Context length is not an output cap.
A text file may supply literal text; image/audio/file-object inputs need exact binding.
Tariff references do not add request options. Supported parameters are listed for the selected method.
Match each charge to the conditions shown. Use one rate for each set of alternative configurations.
| Configuration | Rate schedule | Context tokens, more than | Context tokens, up to and including | Billing quantity | Charge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ConfigurationBase token rates | Rate scheduleBase rate | Context tokens, more than— | Context tokens, up to and includingNo upper bound | Billing quantity— | Charge Input · Input tokens $0.006 / 1K tokens Output · Output tokens $0.03 / 1K tokens Input · Cache read — / 1K tokens Input · Cache write — / 1K tokens Input · Cache write, 1 hour — / 1K tokens |
| ConfigurationRequest-length tier 1 | Rate schedule— | Context tokens, more than0 | Context tokens, up to and includingNo upper bound | Billing quantity— | Charge Input · Input tokens $0.006 / 1K tokens Output · Output tokens $0.03 / 1K tokens Input · Cache read — / 1K tokens Input · Cache write — / 1K tokens Input · Cache write, 1 hour — / 1K tokens |
| ConfigurationPer request | Rate schedule— | Context tokens, more than— | Context tokens, up to and includingNo upper bound | Billing quantityone request | Charge Input $0.036 per request |
Ailoot reserves an estimated amount before a request. After the result, it settles the final charge from measured usage. Streaming settlement uses the final usage record. How reservation and settlement work →
set -eu\n: "${AILOOT_API_KEY:?Set your Ailoot API key}"\npython3 - <<'PY_REQUEST'\nimport json,os\nfrom pathlib import Path\np=json.loads('{"model": "perplexity/sonar-pro-search", "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Explain the difference between an observation and a hypothesis in three sentences."}]}')\n\nPath("request.json").write_text(json.dumps(p,ensure_ascii=False))\nPY_REQUEST\ncurl --fail-with-body --silent --show-error https://api.ailoot.ai/v1/chat/completions \\\n -H "Authorization: Bearer $AILOOT_API_KEY" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \\\n --data-binary @request.json -D response-headers.txt -o result.json\npython3 - <<'PY_RESULT'\nimport json\nfrom pathlib import Path\nr=json.loads(Path("result.json").read_text())\nfor x in r.get("choices",[]):\n if x.get("message",{}).get("content"): print(x["message"]["content"])\nPY_RESULT\nfrom openai import OpenAI\nimport os\n\nif not os.environ.get("AILOOT_API_KEY", "").strip(): raise SystemExit("Set AILOOT_API_KEY before making a request")\nclient=OpenAI(base_url="https://api.ailoot.ai/v1",api_key=os.environ["AILOOT_API_KEY"],max_retries=0)\nresult=client.chat.completions.create(model='perplexity/sonar-pro-search',messages=[{"role":"user","content":"Explain observations and hypotheses in three sentences."}])\nimport base64, json\nfrom pathlib import Path\n\ndef save_result(data, stem="result"):\n # Keep every field, including usage, IDs, reasoning and tool requests.\n Path(stem + ".json").write_text(json.dumps(data, ensure_ascii=False, indent=2), encoding="utf-8")\n print(json.dumps(data, ensure_ascii=False, indent=2))\n def save_blob(encoded, suffix, label):\n raw = base64.b64decode(encoded, altchars=b"-_", validate=True)\n ext = "png" if raw.startswith(b"\\x89PNG\\r\\n\\x1a\\n") else "jpg" if raw.startswith(b"\\xff\\xd8") else "webp" if raw[:4] == b"RIFF" and raw[8:12] == b"WEBP" else suffix\n file = Path(stem + "-" + label + "." + ext)\n file.write_bytes(raw)\n print("Saved", file)\n for index, block in enumerate(data.get("content") or []):\n print("Content", index, json.dumps(block, ensure_ascii=False))\n for choice in data.get("choices") or []:\n print("Choice", choice.get("index"), json.dumps(choice.get("message", choice.get("delta", {})), ensure_ascii=False))\n for index, item in enumerate(data.get("output") or []):\n print("Output", index, json.dumps(item, ensure_ascii=False))\n if item.get("type") == "image_generation_call" and item.get("result"):\n save_blob(item["result"], item.get("output_format") or "bin", "output-" + str(index))\n for ci, candidate in enumerate(data.get("candidates") or []):\n for pi, part in enumerate((candidate.get("content") or {}).get("parts") or []):\n print("Candidate/part", ci, pi, json.dumps(part, ensure_ascii=False))\n blob = part.get("inlineData") or part.get("inline_data")\n if blob and blob.get("data"):\n mime = blob.get("mimeType") or blob.get("mime_type")\n suffix = {"image/png":"png", "image/jpeg":"jpg", "image/webp":"webp", "audio/wav":"wav", "audio/mpeg":"mp3", "video/mp4":"mp4"}.get(mime, "bin")\n save_blob(blob["data"], suffix, "candidate-" + str(ci) + "-part-" + str(pi))\n\nsave_result(result.to_dict(mode="json"))\nfrom openai import OpenAI\nimport os\nfrom pathlib import Path\n\nif not os.environ.get("AILOOT_API_KEY", "").strip(): raise SystemExit("Set AILOOT_API_KEY before making a request")\nclient=OpenAI(base_url="https://api.ailoot.ai/v1",api_key=os.environ["AILOOT_API_KEY"],max_retries=0)\nimport base64, json\nfrom pathlib import Path\n\ndef save_result(data, stem="result"):\n # Keep every field, including usage, IDs, reasoning and tool requests.\n Path(stem + ".json").write_text(json.dumps(data, ensure_ascii=False, indent=2), encoding="utf-8")\n print(json.dumps(data, ensure_ascii=False, indent=2))\n def save_blob(encoded, suffix, label):\n raw = base64.b64decode(encoded, altchars=b"-_", validate=True)\n ext = "png" if raw.startswith(b"\\x89PNG\\r\\n\\x1a\\n") else "jpg" if raw.startswith(b"\\xff\\xd8") else "webp" if raw[:4] == b"RIFF" and raw[8:12] == b"WEBP" else suffix\n file = Path(stem + "-" + label + "." + ext)\n file.write_bytes(raw)\n print("Saved", file)\n for index, block in enumerate(data.get("content") or []):\n print("Content", index, json.dumps(block, ensure_ascii=False))\n for choice in data.get("choices") or []:\n print("Choice", choice.get("index"), json.dumps(choice.get("message", choice.get("delta", {})), ensure_ascii=False))\n for index, item in enumerate(data.get("output") or []):\n print("Output", index, json.dumps(item, ensure_ascii=False))\n if item.get("type") == "image_generation_call" and item.get("result"):\n save_blob(item["result"], item.get("output_format") or "bin", "output-" + str(index))\n for ci, candidate in enumerate(data.get("candidates") or []):\n for pi, part in enumerate((candidate.get("content") or {}).get("parts") or []):\n print("Candidate/part", ci, pi, json.dumps(part, ensure_ascii=False))\n blob = part.get("inlineData") or part.get("inline_data")\n if blob and blob.get("data"):\n mime = blob.get("mimeType") or blob.get("mime_type")\n suffix = {"image/png":"png", "image/jpeg":"jpg", "image/webp":"webp", "audio/wav":"wav", "audio/mpeg":"mp3", "video/mp4":"mp4"}.get(mime, "bin")\n save_blob(blob["data"], suffix, "candidate-" + str(ci) + "-part-" + str(pi))\n\nwith client.chat.completions.stream(model='perplexity/sonar-pro-search',messages=[{"role":"user","content":"Explain observations and hypotheses in three sentences."}]) as stream:\n with Path("stream-events.jsonl").open("w",encoding="utf-8") as log:\n for event in stream:\n payload=event.to_dict(mode="json")\n log.write(json.dumps(payload,ensure_ascii=False)+"\\n"); log.flush()\n print(json.dumps(payload,ensure_ascii=False))\n final=stream.get_final_completion()\n save_result(final.to_dict(mode="json"),"stream-result")\njson or SSE
Keep every complete returned response, file and content part.
Keep every choice and its content/tool calls/reasoning. In SSE assemble deltas by choice/tool index, retain the final finish reason and usage.
Keep request/response IDs and headers. No generic text job retrieval URL is supplied.
| Field | Type |
|---|---|
Fieldchoices[].index | Typeinteger |
Fieldchoices[].message.content | Typestring|null |
Fieldchoices[].message.tool_calls | Typetool_call[] |
Fieldchoices[].message.reasoning_content | Typestring |
Fieldchoices[].message.reasoning_details | Typeobject|array |
Fieldchoices[].finish_reason | Typestring|null |
Fieldusage | Typeobject |
| Response | Condition | Next step |
|---|---|---|
Response400 · invalid_request_error | ConditionInvalid required fields, material representation or parameter value | Next stepCorrect the indicated fields before a new creation request. |
Ailoot Ultra perplexity/sonar-pro-search
Use the method paths shown above.
perplexity/sonar-pro-searchPerplexity’s Sonar Pro Search is the multi-step search mode of Sonar Pro. It combines repeated web searches and page retrieval with reasoning to build a researched answer, with streamed progress in the producer’s documented workflow.
This description covers the model’s capabilities. Available in Ailoot inputs, outputs and options are listed for the selected method below.
Sonar Pro Search is Perplexity’s Pro Search mode for Sonar Pro, designed to answer questions that require several information-gathering steps. It can run repeated web searches, retrieve page content and combine what it finds into a researched response. The mode is distinct from the quicker search path and from the separately named Sonar Deep Research model.
The producer describes automated orchestration of web search and page retrieval. Instead of leaving the user to turn each search result into the next query, the search process can pursue the intermediate questions needed for the answer. Its documented configuration offers pro, fast and automatic search choices; the automatic choice classifies the query by complexity. These are producer search settings rather than names for three different fixed checkpoints.
Perplexity’s published Pro Search workflow requires streaming and exposes the reasoning process while the search develops. A client receiving that producer stream needs to keep the sequence of progress and answer content in order. The finished research answer is the useful artifact; a progress update alone is not the completed explanation or comparison requested by the user.
Prepare the question with the entity, location, period and decision criteria that matter. For example, a technology comparison can ask which documented capabilities satisfy a specified integration requirement, which conditions differ between the candidates and what evidence supports the distinction. An effective result has the comparison, the supporting source material and the unresolved questions that still affect the choice.
For a question with several dependencies, state the final objective and the constraints together. A project investigation might need to identify the relevant product documentation, compare two implementation approaches and explain which published limitations apply. Ask for the findings to be organized by the requirement they answer, so that a reader can trace the conclusion back to the evidence used for it.
Review the returned research as an evidence-based answer: distinguish a source’s explicit statement from the model’s inference, and keep conflicting or incomplete information visible. The model’s role here is search and synthesis. Changes to an external system or execution of a proposed implementation remain actions for the surrounding application.
POST /v1/messagestextjson, sse| Field | Type | Requirement | Values & limits | Default |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Fieldmodel | Typestring | RequirementRequired | Values & limits perplexity/sonar-pro-search | Default— |
Fieldmessages | Typemessage[] | RequirementRequired | Values & limits | Default— |
Fieldmessages[].role | Typestring | RequirementRequired | Values & limits user, assistant | Default— |
Fieldmessages[].content | Typestring | RequirementRequired | Values & limits | Default— |
Fieldmax_tokens | Typeinteger | RequirementRequired | Values & limits | Default— |
Fieldstream | Typeboolean | RequirementOptional | Values & limits | Defaultfalse |
Text · UTF-8 text
messages[].content string
| Parameter | Contract |
|---|---|
Parametercontent_type | Contractapplication/json |
Parameterrequired | Contractmodel, messages, max_tokens |
Parameteroptional_controls | Contractstream |
Parametermaterial_types | Contracttext |
Parametertext_file_material | ContractRead the actual UTF-8 document and put its text in the indicated input or message content string. |
Lifecycle: synchronous_or_streamed
Tariff references do not add request options. Supported parameters are listed for the selected method.
Match each charge to the conditions shown. Use one rate for each set of alternative configurations.
| Configuration | Rate schedule | Context tokens, more than | Context tokens, up to and including | Billing quantity | Charge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ConfigurationBase token rates | Rate scheduleBase rate | Context tokens, more than— | Context tokens, up to and includingNo upper bound | Billing quantity— | Charge Input · Input tokens $0.006 / 1K tokens Output · Output tokens $0.03 / 1K tokens Input · Cache read — / 1K tokens Input · Cache write — / 1K tokens Input · Cache write, 1 hour — / 1K tokens |
| ConfigurationRequest-length tier 1 | Rate schedule— | Context tokens, more than0 | Context tokens, up to and includingNo upper bound | Billing quantity— | Charge Input · Input tokens $0.006 / 1K tokens Output · Output tokens $0.03 / 1K tokens Input · Cache read — / 1K tokens Input · Cache write — / 1K tokens Input · Cache write, 1 hour — / 1K tokens |
| ConfigurationPer request | Rate schedule— | Context tokens, more than— | Context tokens, up to and includingNo upper bound | Billing quantityone request | Charge Input $0.036 per request |
Ailoot reserves an estimated amount before a request. After the result, it settles the final charge from measured usage. Streaming settlement uses the final usage record. How reservation and settlement work →
{\n "model": "perplexity/sonar-pro-search",\n "max_tokens": 128,\n "messages": [\n {\n "role": "user",\n "content": "Summarize the incident report."\n }\n ],\n "stream": false\n}set -eu\n: "${AILOOT_API_KEY:?Set your Ailoot API key}"\n: "${AILOOT_TEXT_FILE:?Set your actual UTF-8 document}"\nexport AILOOT_TEXT_FILE\npython3 - <<'PY_REQUEST'\nimport json, os\nfrom pathlib import Path\n\nsource_file = Path(os.environ['AILOOT_TEXT_FILE'])\nif not source_file.is_file():\n raise SystemExit('Set AILOOT_TEXT_FILE to your actual UTF-8 document')\ntext = source_file.read_text(encoding='utf-8')\nif not text.strip():\n raise SystemExit('Choose a document containing text')\npayload = {'model': 'perplexity/sonar-pro-search', 'max_tokens': 128, 'messages': [{'role': 'user', 'content': 'Summarize the incident report.'}]}\npayload['messages'][0]['content'] = 'Summarize this material and quote supporting source passages.\\n\\n' + text\nPath('request.json').write_text(json.dumps(payload, ensure_ascii=False), encoding='utf-8')\nPY_REQUEST\ncurl --fail-with-body --silent --show-error https://api.ailoot.ai/v1/messages \\\n -H "x-api-key: $AILOOT_API_KEY" -H 'anthropic-version: 2023-06-01' -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \\\n --data-binary @request.json -D response-headers.txt -o result.json\npython3 - <<'PY_RESULT'\nimport json\nfrom pathlib import Path\n\nresult = json.loads(Path('result.json').read_text(encoding='utf-8'))\nprint(json.dumps(result, ensure_ascii=False, indent=2))\nPY_RESULT\nimport json, os\nfrom pathlib import Path\n\nsource_file = Path(os.environ['AILOOT_TEXT_FILE'])\nif not source_file.is_file():\n raise SystemExit('Set AILOOT_TEXT_FILE to your actual UTF-8 document')\ntext = source_file.read_text(encoding='utf-8')\nif not text.strip():\n raise SystemExit('Choose a document containing text')\npayload = {'model': 'perplexity/sonar-pro-search', 'max_tokens': 128, 'messages': [{'role': 'user', 'content': 'Summarize the incident report.'}]}\npayload['messages'][0]['content'] = 'Summarize this material and quote supporting source passages.\\n\\n' + text\nfrom urllib.request import Request, urlopen\nfrom urllib.error import HTTPError\n\napi_key = os.environ['AILOOT_API_KEY']\nif not api_key.strip():\n raise SystemExit('Set AILOOT_API_KEY before making a request')\nheaders = {'x-api-key': 'PLACEHOLDER_KEY', 'anthropic-version': '2023-06-01', 'Content-Type': 'application/json'}\nheaders['x-api-key'] = api_key\nrequest = Request('https://api.ailoot.ai/v1/messages', data=json.dumps(payload, ensure_ascii=False).encode('utf-8'), headers=headers, method='POST')\ntry:\n with urlopen(request, timeout=120) as response:\n raw = response.read()\n Path('response-headers.txt').write_text(str(response.headers), encoding='utf-8')\nexcept HTTPError as error:\n Path('result.json').write_bytes(error.read())\n Path('response-headers.txt').write_text(str(error.headers), encoding='utf-8')\n raise\nPath('result.json').write_bytes(raw)\nimport json\nfrom pathlib import Path\n\nresult = json.loads(Path('result.json').read_text(encoding='utf-8'))\nprint(json.dumps(result, ensure_ascii=False, indent=2))\nJSON or SSE
Keep every complete returned response, file and content part.
Keep all content blocks, thinking signatures and actual tool-use IDs. Assemble all SSE block deltas; a first text block is not the complete output.
Keep request/response IDs and headers. No generic text job retrieval URL is supplied.
| Field | Type |
|---|---|
Fieldid | Typestring |
Fieldmodel | Typestring |
Fieldcontent[] | Typetext|thinking|tool_use|other content block |
Fieldstop_reason | Typestring|null |
Fieldusage | Typeobject |
| Response | Condition | Next step |
|---|---|---|
Response400 · invalid_request_error | ConditionInvalid required fields, material representation or parameter value | Next stepCorrect the indicated fields before a new creation request. |
Ailoot Ultra perplexity/sonar-pro-search
Use the method paths shown above.
Technical example in English
Synthesize a multi-source integration comparison\n\nUse these supplied documentation excerpts to compare storage choices. DOC-A: Product A supports daily snapshots and restore of an entire project. DOC-B: Product B supports hourly snapshots and restore of individual records. Our requirement is hourly recovery of one accidentally deleted record. Identify the relevant capabilities, recommend the better-documented fit and list unresolved retention and access questions.A requirement-led comparison citing DOC-A and DOC-B, a recommendation and explicit gaps in the supplied evidence.The answer links both snapshot frequency and restore granularity to the requirement and does not invent retention limits.